925 Sterling Silver Vintage Boho Floral Filigree Ring
925 Sterling Silver Vintage Boho Floral Filigree Ring
Regular price
$22.99 USD
Regular price
Sale price
$22.99 USD
Unit price
per
Free Shipping – Across the United States
Ships Today
Couldn't load pickup availability
- Item# : GR490-5
- description_tag : Discover timeless elegance with our 925 Sterling Silver Vintage Boho Floral Filigree Ring for Women. Crafted with intricate floral designs, this ring offers a unique blend of vintage charm and bohemian style. Perfect for adding a touch of sophistication to any outfit. Shop now for this exquisite piece!
- Gender : For Her
- title_tag : Sterling Silver Vintage Boho Floral Filigree Ring for Women - GR490
This is a beautiful sterling silver ring with a floral filigree design. The ring is made of 925 sterling silver and has a vintage look. It's perfect for everyday wear and makes a great gift for loved ones. A timeless piece of elegance and luxury that is sure to be treasured for years to come. Rejoice in the beauty and craftsmanship of this unique creation.
- We dispatch 99% of orders within 24 hours (excluding weekends and holidays).
- Shipping is available to the US, UK, Canada, Germany, Australia, and Japan. Delivery costs are calculated at checkout.
- Every item is shipped from our facility in Charlotte, NC and we don’t dropship, your order is handled directly in-house for faster service.
- We want you to love your purchase! If you’re not satisfied, returns are accepted within 30 days of delivery.
- Items must be unused and in original condition.
- Return of products with Free Shipping, actual shipping costs and a small handling fee will be deducted from the refund.
- Contact us before returning to receive instructions and ensure smooth processing
If you need any assistance, please contact our friendly customer support team at info@gemavenue.com, and one of our staff members will be happy to help. You can also reach us through the Chat feature on our website.
For quick answers, visit our FAQ page to see if your question has already been covered.