6mm Labradorite Gemstone Rounds Bead Unisex Stretch Bracelet
6mm Labradorite Gemstone Rounds Bead Unisex Stretch Bracelet
Couldn't load pickup availability
- Item# : 04-0048
- description_tag : Discover the timeless beauty of this 6mm Labradorite Gemstone Rounds Bead Stretch Bracelet. Perfect for both men and women, this unisex bracelet is designed for comfort and style. Available exclusively through Gem Avenue Retail in Charlotte, NC, they are the perfect item or gift consideration for any occasion.
- Gender : Unisex
- Origin : China
- Stone : Labradorite
- Style : Stretch
- title_tag : 6mm Labradorite Gemstone Bead Stretch Bracelet - GB313
Beautiful Labradorite 6mm stretch bead bracelets! Each bracelet is composed of 6mm Labradorite beads. Due to the use of natural stone please allow for some variance. You will only receive one bracelet!
Here at Gem Avenue, we pride ourselves on providing the best quality Labradorite bracelets in order to ensure the utmost satisfaction of all our customers! We are positive you will not be disappointed with your purchase!
- We dispatch 99% of orders within 24 hours (excluding weekends and holidays).
- Shipping is available to the US, UK, Canada, Germany, Australia, and Japan. Delivery costs are calculated at checkout.
- Every item is shipped from our facility in Charlotte, NC and we don’t dropship, your order is handled directly in-house for faster service.
- We want you to love your purchase! If you’re not satisfied, returns are accepted within 30 days of delivery.
- Items must be unused and in original condition.
- Return of products with Free Shipping, actual shipping costs and a small handling fee will be deducted from the refund.
- Contact us before returning to receive instructions and ensure smooth processing
If you need any assistance, please contact our friendly customer support team at info@gemavenue.com, and one of our staff members will be happy to help. You can also reach us through the Chat feature on our website.
For quick answers, visit our FAQ page to see if your question has already been covered.